Hot spot policing
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Disparity Ratings
Potential to decrease disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Potential for mixed impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating could increase and decrease disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence or expert opinion.
Potential to increase disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to increase or exacerbate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Inconclusive impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Disparity Ratings
Potential to decrease disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Potential for mixed impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating could increase and decrease disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence or expert opinion.
Potential to increase disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to increase or exacerbate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Inconclusive impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Community conditions, also known as the social determinants of health, shape the health of individuals and communities. Quality education, jobs that pay a living wage and a clean environment are among the conditions that impact our health. Modifying these social, economic and environmental conditions can influence how long and how well people live.
Learn more about community conditions by viewing our model of health.
Societal rules shape community conditions. These rules can be written and formalized through laws, policies, regulations and budgets, or unwritten and informal, appearing in worldviews, values and norms. People with power create and uphold societal rules. These rules have the potential to maintain or shift power, which affects whether community conditions improve or worsen.
Learn more about societal rules and power by viewing our model of health.
Hot spot policing is a place-based policing intervention that focuses police resources and enforcement on high-activity crime locations within a community, such as buildings, street blocks, and subway stations. Various tactics can be implemented in hot spot policing, for example, increased time spent on enforcement, problem-oriented policing, and offender-focused policing1, 2.
What could this strategy improve?
Expected Benefits
Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:
Reduced crime
Potential Benefits
Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:
Improved sense of community
What does the research say about effectiveness?
There is strong evidence that hot spot policing in small geographic areas reduces crime2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Regardless of policing tactics, hot spot policing in micro-geographic locations (e.g., street segments, blocks) is more effective to reduce crime than hot spot policing in large areas5. Implementing hot spot policing does not lead to crime displacement into surrounding areas3, 7, 8.
Applying problem-oriented policing and patrol in hot spots has been shown to reduce crime for greater time periods and larger amounts than increasing the level of traditional police actions1, 2, 5. Proactive, systematic patrol in hot spots based on crime incident data from the prior 1-2 weeks can have long-term effects on reducing crime6, 7.
Offender-focused policing tactics may reduce crime when applied to smaller hot spots9, 10: such tactics including surveillance and police stops may be more effective in reducing crime than high visibility car patrol in hot spots11. Deploying surveillance devices in hot spot policing efforts also appears to reduce crime12. Overall, police presence focused on specific areas, times, and types of crime have greater effects to reduce crime13. Increased enforcement activity and time spent in hot spots may reduce police calls, theft, and firearm assaults8, 14, 15, 16. However, youth-focused problem-oriented policing in hot spots does not lead to a reduction in youth violent crime17. Traffic stops in hot spots are associated with more impaired driving arrests and citations and appear to be more cost-effective than traffic stops outside hot spots18.
Studies suggest that hot spot policing efforts have short-term negative effects on residents’ perceptions of procedural justice, but increase their willingness to cooperate with police, sense of community, social cohesion, and shared ownership in the long term19, 20. Other studies suggest that applying problem-oriented policing and patrol in hot spots, when implemented intensively with positive police-community interactions, can improve residents’ perceptions of police legitimacy and procedural justice21, 22. Hot spot policing has the potential to prevent health risk behaviors (e.g., drug use or public drinking) and improve residents’ mental health and overall health by reducing violent crime and fear of crime in community23, 24, 25.
Low levels of dosage in policing in hot spots, police officers’ low motivation for and skeptical attitude toward hot spot policing, and organizational resistance are challenges and barriers to producing positive impacts17, 26, 27. Experts recommend the use of crime analysis to identify micro-hot spot locations, regular and daily directed patrol visits, officer training in procedural justice, policing practices that emphasize community engagement and build trust between the police and community members for effective and respectful policing in hot spots7, 28, 29.
How could this strategy advance health equity? This strategy is rated inconclusive impact on disparities.
It is unclear what impact hot spot policing may have on racial disparities and disparities across other population groups. Available evidence suggests that there was no difference in arrest rates between white and minoritized individuals after implementing hot spot policing in Los Angeles31. A Minneapolis-based study indicates that traffic stops in crime hot spots are associated with more discretionary searches of Black drivers, but not with those of Hispanic or white drivers32. Careful targeting with a focus on specific streets or blocks within a community is suggested to prevent any racial bias in hot spot policing33. Researchers recommend consideration of the underlying cause of crime concentration and critical analysis of policing efforts in hot spots to prevent negative impact on racial disparities34.
Increases in time spent on directed patrol tactics (i.e., foot or car patrols) in hot spots of neighborhoods with higher poverty rates can improve social cohesion among residents in the long term compared to standard policing20. Individuals with mental health issues who live in areas with high concentrations of crime (i.e., crime hot spots) are likely to report greater fear and less trust of the police than those who live in areas with less concentrations of crime (i.e., crime cold spots): police officers should pay attention to safety and the quality of life among hot spot residents including those with mental health issues25. Support for hot spot policing in the general public seems to vary by race and ethnicity and income level: Black, Hispanic, and individuals with low incomes are less likely to be supportive of using more resources in hot spot policing and prefer situational prevention and policing all areas equally35.
What is the relevant historical background?
Institutional racism in law enforcement and police officer racial prejudice has led to differential treatment of racially and ethnically minoritized populations by police in the U.S.36. Police in the U.S. originated with slave patrols in the 1700s that used excessive force in attempt to control people who were enslaved37, 38. Law enforcement has a long history of both enforcing discriminatory policies, such as Jim Crow laws, as well as disproportionately targeting Black communities39, 40, 41. Discriminatory policing and police violence have produced justified distrust for the police among racially minoritized individuals and communities36, 42.
Hot spot policing in the U.S. emerged based on the place-based theories about routine activity and crime pattern that explain the concentration of crime at places20. Since the success of the first experiments in Minnesota in 1980s, hot spot policing has become popular as police departments increasingly gained the capacity to analyze crime data and identify crime hot spots3. However, researchers warn that implementing such placed-based policing strategies without understanding the underlying causes of crime concentration and critically analyzing policing actions may worsen racial disparities34. Researchers recommend laws that shape fair policing actions, for example, allocating racially equitable police stops in crime hot spots that are based on the higher evidentiary standards43, 44.
Equity Considerations
- Where are crime hot spots in your community? What data and analysis are used to identify hot spots? How can the police department identify hot spots fairly and equitably?
- What are the underlying causes of crime concentration? How are the hot spots associated with community disadvantages (e.g., community environment, infrastructure, etc.)? How are the lives of the residents impacted in hot spots?
- How could police and the community create effective and fair public safety strategies?
Implementation Examples
Implementation Resources
‡ Resources with a focus on equity.
CEBCP-Hot spots - Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy (CEBCP). Hot spots lab.
Telep-Hot spots - Telep, C. W., & Hibdon, J. (2019). Understanding and responding to crime and disorder hot spots. U.S. Department of Justice (Problem-Oriented Guides for Police: Problem-Solving Tools Series No. 14). Office of Justice Programs.
Footnotes
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
1 Campbell-Braga 2012a - Braga, A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2012). Hot spots policing effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1-96.
2 CEBCP-Hot spots - Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy (CEBCP). Hot spots lab.
3 Campbell-Braga 2019 - Braga, A. A., Turchan, B., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2019). Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3), e1046.
4 Braga 2022 - Braga, A.A., & Weisburd, D.L. (2022). Does hot spots policing have meaningful impacts on crime? Findings from an alternative approach to estimating effect sizes from place-based program evaluations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38, 1-22.
5 Petersen 2024 - Petersen, K., Weisburd, D., Hinkle, J. C., Telep, C. W., & Fay, S. (2024). Does level of geography influence proactive policing's impact on crime? A synthesis of systematic reviews of three evidence-based policing strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 78, 101988.
6 Santos 2021 - Santos, R.B., & Santos, R.G. (2021). Proactive police response in property crime micro-time hot spots: Results from a partially-blocked blind random controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 247–265.
7 Koper 2021a - Koper, C. S., Lum, C., Wu, X., & Hegarty, T. (2021). The long-term and system-level impacts of institutionalizing hot spot policing in a small city. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(2), 1110-1128.
8 Rosenfeld 2014 - Rosenfeld, R., Deckard, M. J., & Blackburn, E. (2014). The effects of directed patrol and self-initiated enforcement on firearm violence: A randomized controlled study of hot spot policing. Criminology, 52(3), 428-449.
9 Groff 2015 - Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., Joyce, N. M., & Taylor, R. B. (2015). Does what police do at hot spots matter? The Philadelphia policing tactics experiment. Criminology, 53(1), 23-53.
10 Santos 2016 - Santos, R. B., & Santos, R. G. (2016). Offender-focused police intervention in residential burglary and theft from vehicle hot spots: A partially blocked randomized control trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(3), 373-402.
11 Smith 2024 - Smith, M. R., Tillyer, R., & Tregle,B. (2024). Hot spots policing as part of a city-wide violent crime reduction strategy: Initial evidence from Dallas. Journal of Criminal Justice, 90, 102091.
12 Koper 2013 - Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., & Woods, D. J. (2013). A randomized test of initial and residual deterrence from directed patrols and use of license plate readers at crime hot spots. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(2), 213-244.
13 Dau 2023 - Dau, P.M., Vandeviver, C., Dewinter, M., Witlox, F., & Beken, T. V. (2023). Policing directions: A systematic review on the effectiveness of police presence. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29, 191–225.
14 Corsaro 2023 - Corsaro, N., Engel, R. S., Herold, T. D., Yildirim, M., & Motz, R. T. (2023). Hot spots policing in Las Vegas: Results from a blocked randomized controlled trial in chronic violent crime locations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19, 213-235.
15 Mohler 2015 - Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., Johnson, M., Tita, G. E., Bertozzi, A. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(512), 1399-1411.
16 Telep 2014 - Telep, C. W., Mitchell, R. J., & Weisburd, D. (2014). How much time should the police spend at crime hot spots? Answers from a police agency directed randomized field trial in Sacramento, California. Justice Quarterly, 31(5), 905-933.
17 Taylor 2024 - Taylor, B.G., Liu, W., Zalsha, S., Sheridan-Johnson, J., Sabol, G., & Lacy, C. R. (2024). The impact of a youth-focused problem-oriented policing initiative on crime: Findings from a randomized controlled trial in three cities. Journal of Experimental Criminology.
18 Maistros 2018 - Maistros, A., & Schneider, W. H. (2018). A comparison of overtime patrol stops made inside and out of cluster identified hotspots. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(3), 235-240.
19 Kochel 2017 - Kochel, T. R., & Weisburd, D. (2017). Assessing community consequences of implementing hot spots policing in residential areas: Findings from a randomized field trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(2), 143-170.
20 Kochel 2019 - Kochel, T. R. & Weisburd, D. (2019). The impact of hot spots policing on collective efficacy: Findings from a randomized field trial. Justice Quarterly, 36(5), 900-928.
21 Koper 2024 - Koper, C. S., Liu, W., Taylor, B. G., Wu, X., Johnson, W. D., & Sheridan, J. (2024). The effects of hot spot policing on community experiences and perceptions in a time of COVID-19 and calls for police reform. Police Quarterly, 27(3), 292-334.
22 Koper 2022 - Koper, C. S., Taylor, B. G., Liu, W., & Wu, X. (2022). Police activities and community views of police in crime hot spots. Justice Quarterly, 39(7), 1400-1427.
23 Jensen 2019 - Jensen, R. H. (2019). What has place got to do with it? Hot spots policing to address physical and mental health. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 35(2), 124-141.
24 Dong 2020 - Dong, B., White, C. M., & Weisburd, D. L. (2020). Poor health and violent crime hot spots: Mitigating the undesirable co-occurrence through focused place-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 58(6), 799-806.
25 Goldberg 2019 - Goldberg, V., White, C., & Weisburd, D. (2019). Perspectives of people with mental health problems at hot spots: Attitudes and perceptions of safety, crime, and the police. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(6), 650-664.
26 Ariel 2023 - Ariel, B. (2023). Implementation issues with hot spot policing. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 75, 100629.
27 Schaefer 2021 - Schaefer, B. P., Hughes, T., & Cameron Stelzig, W. (2021). Hot spots across the metropolis: Evaluating hot spots directed patrol at city and suburban locations. Justice Quarterly, 38(1), 101-123.
28 Weisburd 2022 - Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vovak, H., Zastrow, T., Braga, A. A., & Turchan, B. (2022). Reforming the police through procedural justice training: A multicity randomized trial at crime hot spots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 119 (14), e2118780119.
29 Weisburd 2021 - Weisburd, D., Gill, C., Wooditch, A., Barritt, W., & Murphy, J. (2021). Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17, 161-191.
30 CrimeSolutions-Hot spots - National Institute of Justice, CrimeSolutions.gov. Practice profile: Hot spots policing.
31 Brantingham 2018 - Brantingham, P. J., Valasik, M., & Mohler, G. O. (2018). Does predictive policing lead to biased arrests? Results from a randomized controlled trial. Statistics and Public Policy, 5(1), 1-6.
32 Briggs 2017 - Briggs, S. J., & Keimig, K. A. (2017). The impact of police deployment on racial disparities in discretionary searches. Race and Justice, 7(3), 256-275.
33 Weisburd 2016 - Weisburd, D. (2016). Does hot spots policing inevitably lead to unfair and abusive police practices, or can we maximize both fairness and effectiveness in the new proactive policing? University of Chicago Legal Forum, 16, 661-689.
34 Brunson 2024 - Brunson, R. K., Vélez, M. B., & Tapia, E. (2024). A race-centered critique of place-based research and policing. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 78, 101959.
35 Metcalfe 2018 - Metcalfe, C., & Pickett, J. T. (2018). The extent and correlates of public support for deterrence reforms and hot spots policing. Law & Society Review. 52(2),471-502.
36 Carvalho 2022 - Carvalho, A. A. S., Mizael, T. M., & Sampaio, A. A. S. (2021). Racial prejudice and police stops: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1213–1220.
37 Ward 2022 - Ward, M. (2022). The legacy of slavery and contemporary racial disparities in arrest rates. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 8(4), 534–552.
38 NAACP-Police origins - NAACP. The origins of modern day policing. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
39 History-Jim Crow laws - History.com. (2024, January 22). Jim Crow laws.
40 Mesic 2018 - Mesic, A., Franklin, L., Cansever, A., Potter, F., Sharma, A., Knopov, A., & Siegel, M. (2018). The relationship between structural racism and Black-white disparities in fatal police shootings at the state level. Journal of the National Medical Association, 110(2), 106–116.
41 Siegel 2020a - Siegel, M. (2020). Racial disparities in fatal police shootings: An empirical analysis informed by critical race theory. Boston University Law Review, 100, 1069–1092.
42 NBER-Ang 2024 - Ang, D., Bencsik, P., Bruhn, J. M., & Derenoncourt, E. (2024). Community engagement with law enforcement after high-profile acts of police violence [Working Paper 32243]. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
43 Lautenschlager 2024 - Lautenschlager, R. (2024). The geography of (un)reasonable suspicion: Rethinking causes of racial disparities in police stops. Law & Policy, 46(1), 45-62.
44 Wheeler 2020 - Wheeler, A. P. (2020). Allocating police resources while limiting racial inequality. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 842-868.
Related What Works for Health Strategies
To see all strategies:
countyhealthrankings.org/whatworks